I must confess that I am not a royal watcher, so apart from the very basic facts, I know next to nothing of Prince Harry. I have also never seen any film of Meghan Markle, so I know even littler of her. However, given that the couple are so often in the news, I thought it worthwhile to examine their hands. That has proven to be a good decision, as both their hands show very interesting head lines.

While I could find some photos of Markle’s right hand easily, it was difficult to find good photos of Harry’s hands. So, yet again, just like I did with Parineeti & Raghav, I will start with the girl.

Meghan Markle, b. 1981, major hand: right

(Meghan Markle, right hand pictured in January 2018)

(Meghan Markle’s left hand and Prince Harry’s right hand, seen in November 2017)

The very first thing to notice on Markle’s right hand is the extraordinary double head line, which also acts as the heart line, thus a simian line kind of thing in a way, with one of the branches going all the way to the percussion and the other going to the Mount of Luna. What does this point to? Immense brain power, a kind of dual personality, intense, obsessive, and repressive personality, someone who may have difficulty in having any empathy with others and a high amount of selfishness and someone highly creative. (It would be great to get a proper hand print, so one could see the fingerprints.) The thumb is also long, pointing to a very strong will power and determination, but at the same time lending a certain brutal reinforcement to the selfishness mentioned earlier and aggressiveness. The fingers are also a bit on the long side, thus giving another corroboration of the high intellectual capacity. The determination aspect gets further corroboration from the long middle phalanges. The finger of Mercury sticks out a little bit and is quite long, too. The Apollo finger is long, too. This marks the subject as witty and with a good sense of humour and also is something one would expect often on an actor’s hand. (There is also a fine Sun line, to be expected again on a successful actor’s hand.) The sticking out of Mercury finger indicates also a high degree of independence of mind. There also is a very strong line in her hand that seems to come from the head line going to the mount of Jupiter, which, if you were to say, could also function as her limited heart line fusing into the head line, given that she has none actually as a heart line. This, if indeed true, indicates a person extremely hungry for power.

Something which could easily overlook on Markle’s palm is a certain hollowness to it, and if one sees where exactly this hollow is around, it is at the heart line under Saturn. One could thus deduce or predict disappointment in her affections and also, maybe, some attendant misfortune or loss on the wealth side. Maybe the affections and wealth misfortune are linked as well. A divorce likely with Prince Harry, who I assume must be filthy rich? None of the photos is good enough to show influence lines, which are important to make any kind of prediction regarding this particular relationship, and otherwise she does have good support lines in her life, thus people whom she can rely on or whose affection she feels. So, nothing can be said for certain, but given that Markle shows a head line expressing a high level of intense brain power and both obsessiveness and repressiveness, and the hollowness in Markle’s palm at the place it is, I would not be surprised if the couple breaks up. While a relationship with such a person can have very high highs, sparks flying and all that, it would be difficult for most people to sustain it long enough without getting consumed themselves and yet remain interesting to her.

If one reads some other things, Markle shows, via her mount of Venus and life line, a robust constitution and good levels of physical energy (she already shows immense level of mental energy). A very interesting feature is her deficient lower mount of Luna, which, one would say, is strange for someone in the artistic field. Thus, a deficient taste for the romantic, a deficient imagination? That wouldn’t be too strange in an intense person. A creative person, thus, whose creativity is born more from her intensity rather than her imagination. It also seems that she will have a better and better career of her own from now onwards, especially from around the age of 45 (probably back as an actress?), but, again, as the photos are not even half-decent when it comes to fate and influence lines, I can’t comment further.

So let’s move on Prince Harry.

Prince Harry, b. 1984, major hand: right

(Prince Harry, major hand pictured in December 2015)

(Prince Harry, minor hand, picture taken in March or April 2023)

His hands are on the small side, especially if one compares to Markle. He does not have the intellectual capacity of Markle, yet at the same time, he shows slightly knotty finger joints, especially on the minor hand, meaning a person who is more methodical in thinking and does not rush to actions, but this quality has become less as he has grown up. Most tips are squarish, again mitigating any impulsiveness. The slight bend of his top phalanges on his Jupiter and Mercury fingers in his major hand shows some sense of insecurity about his identity as well as a certain sexual insecurity or communication skills, too, which is seeking the reliance of his fame or looks to bolster them. For his interesting heart line, let’s look at another photo.

(Prince Harry, major hand, undated photo but taken by April 2020)

The heart line does go to Jupiter, though not on the apex itself, but what is more interesting that it is not a graceful curve to Jupiter. The curve is not graceful, because the line, at around the time where the Saturn ends and Sun starts, leaves its natural course and sinks towards the head line. In addition, from the head line, a strong offshoot emerges towards Mercury–one could say it even an extra head line–that not only touches the heart line but even crosses it (at what seems to be the age of around 47 from the heart line). All of this combination points to one quite certain thing: a person blinded by fascination or affection towards someone (who manifests qualities associated with Mercury, that is, someone with a quick wit, lovely humour, calculative mind … and yes, Meghan Markle has all these qualities), and which will also prove harmful to him. In a nutshell, at least the hand shows that the relationship of Prince Harry with Meghan Markle is not in his best interests, and he has become blind to the dangers of it. I say danger, because his mount of Luna is overdeveloped and his head line, though not completely drooping into it, does go towards it. This means, when seen in conjunction of all that I have said above, the person could fall into severe depression. Also taking the quadrangle into account, I see severe depression in his hands in the age period of around 43 to 59. Thankfully, the thumb is big, meaning he has self-control and he can overcome it.

What else one can read on his hands? His career looks completely defined by his family, with his fate line similar to the one I had seen on the hands of India’s Nehru family heir Rahul Gandhi. It is no wonder that Harry’s hands show insecurity about identity. To Harry’s credit, his minor hand shows also pressures from family and a curtailment to his creativity because of them, but given that his major hand does not show these anymore, he has worked to overcome this. He still has the insecurity about his identity to work upon, and maybe his blind fascination towards Markle is his attempt to define himself out of the shadows of the royal family. But he seems not to have chosen wisely. However, there does seem to be an effort to break away from his family-defined fate in his hands, so it’s better than the case of Rahul Gandhi, who does not seem to make any such effort.

I do not have better-quality photos to work with, so I can judge only this much regarding Meghan Markle & Prince Harry.

Disclaimer: These are only my own interpretations from the corpus of photos of public figures available in public domain. These should neither be construed as any claim to truth nor any aspersions on any person’s character.